Quantum Mechanics - Lowering Operator

izzmach
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let A be a lowering operator.

Homework Equations


Show that A is a derivative respects to raising operator, A†,

A=d/dA†

The Attempt at a Solution


I start by defining a function in term of A†, which is f(A†) and solve it using [A , f(A†)] but i get stuck after that. Can someone please explain briefly what i should do in the next step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##A_+|n> = |n-1> \, , \, A_-|n+1> = |n> ## so
$$ A_+\,A_-\, |n> = |n> \,\Rightarrow\,\left(A_+A_- + [A_+,A_-]\right)|n> = |n> $$
 
theodoros.mihos said:
##A_+|n> = |n-1> \, , \, A_-|n+1> = |n> ## so
$$ A_+\,A_-\, |n> = |n> \,\Rightarrow\,\left(A_+A_- + [A_+,A_-]\right)|n> = |n> $$

sorry, i don't quite understand. Mind to explain it?
 
## |n> = \Psi_n ## my English is very poor for this theme. ## \frac{d}{dA_+}\left(A_+A_-+1\right) ## is that you need.
 
izzmach said:
I start by defining a function in term of A†, which is f(A†) and solve it using [A , f(A†)] but i get stuck after that. Can someone please explain briefly what i should do in the next step?
You didn't write out the commutation relations in your initial post. I.e., ##~[A, A^\dagger] = \dots ~?##

Start by working out ##[A, (A^\dagger)^2]##, and ##[A, (A^\dagger)^3]## using the Leibniz product rule for commutators. This should help you see the pattern. Then try to prove ##[A, (A^\dagger)^k] = k (A^\dagger)^{k-1}## by induction on ##k##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top