Quantum Mechanics Problem: ionization potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ionization potential of alkali atoms, specifically how the effective charge (Zeff) for the outer electron can be approximated using quantum numbers for Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs. The formula for the potential energy of the valence electron is provided, but clarification is sought on the relationship between ionization potential and ionization energy. It is confirmed that ionization energy and ionization potential are essentially the same, with the distinction that ionization potential may be expressed in volts, requiring conversion to energy units. The differences in Zeff from unity are attributed to the shielding effect of inner electrons. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating ionization potentials in quantum mechanics.
wee00x
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The outer electron (valence electron) of an alkali atom may be treated in an approximate way, as if it were in a hydrogenic orbital. Suppose that one takes the quantum number for the valence electron to be 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively, for Li, Na, K, Rb, and Cs. What values of the corresponding effective charge, Zeff, must be assumed to account for the observed first ionization potentials of these atoms? Explain why they differ from unity.

So for the formula, I'm pretty sure it is

Vn eff = -(Zeff(n)e^2)/4pi(episilon0)

But I'm lost on the definition of ionization potential. Is it just ionization energy? How does this relate to the formula.. please help me! I'm lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ionization energy and ionization potential are the same thing. But there is a caveat. Ionization energy is measured in eV (or other energy units). Ionization potential MAY be measured in just volts, in which case it must be multiplied by the elementary charge e to get true ionization energy.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Do You Calculate the Minimum Wavelength to Ionize Hydrogen Atoms?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Quantum Electron Energy Level for Hydrogenic atom
Replies
3
Views
4K
Standard electrode potential vs ionization energy
Replies
5
Views
5K
Electric Potential, Capacitance and charge of a Geiger Counter
Replies
1
Views
3K
Deriving the ionization energy of a hydrogen atom
Replies
3
Views
5K
Chemistry How do we know ##BF_3## has Lewis structure but ##Al_2S_3## does not?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Spin-Orbit Coupling in Hydrogen Atom: Understanding the Calculation
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Interpretations of diffusion in Quantum Mechanics.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Struggeling with quantum mechanics
Replies
17
Views
3K
A Cause of spontaneous emission?
Replies
15
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top