Quantum Mechanics: Question on Angular Momentum

Collisionman
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a system that is initially in the state:

\psi\left(\theta,\phi\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}Y_{1,-1}\left(\theta,\phi\right) + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}Y_{1,0}\left(\theta,\phi\right)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}Y_{1,1}\left(\theta,\phi\right)

Part 1: Find <\psi|L_{+}|\psi>
Part 2: If L_{z} is measured, what values would one obtain and with what probabilities?

Homework Equations



  • L_{z}|lm>=mh|lm>
  • L_{+}|lm>=[l(l+1)-m(m+1)]^{\frac{1}{2}}h|lm + 1>
  • Probability = \frac{|<\varphi|\psi>|^{2}}{<\psi|\psi>}

The Attempt at a Solution



For Part 1:

So I started off by putting the expression for \psi\left(\theta,\phi\right) in Bra-Ket notation:

|\psi> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|1,-1> + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}|1,0> + \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|1,1>

Then I applied L_{+} to each individual component:
  • L_{+}|1,-1> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}[1(1+1)-(-1)(-1+1)]^{\frac{1}{2}}h|1,0> = \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}h|1,0>
  • L_{+}|1,0> = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}[1(1+1)-0(0+1)]^{\frac{1}{2}}h|1,1> = \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}h|1,1>
  • L_{+}|1,1> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}[1(1+1)-(-1)(-1+1)]^{\frac{1}{2}}h|1,2> = 0

So, L_{+}|\psi> = \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}h|1,0>+ \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}h|1,1>

And then,

<\psi|L_{+}|\psi> = <1,0|\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}h|1,0>+ <1,1|\frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}h|1,1>
As <1,1|1,1> = 1 and <1,0|1,0>=1
<\psi|L_{+}|\psi> = \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}h+ \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}h

I think I'm going wrong here somewhere. I think I'm using the wrong complex conjugate. Can someone verify if I am or not?

For Part 2:

I took \psi\left(\theta,\phi\right) in Bra-Ket notation as before, i.e.,

|\psi> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|1,-1> + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}|1,0> + \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|1,1>

And used L_{z}|lm>=mh|lm> to try and obtain a value for L_{z}. I used this on individual components as follows;

  • L_{z}|1,-1> = \frac{-h}{\sqrt{5}}|1,-1>
  • L_{z}|1,0> = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}(0)h|1, 0> = 0
  • L_{z}|1,1> = \frac{h}{\sqrt{5}}|1,1>

Then I multiplied by the complex conjugate, i.e.,

  • <1,-1|L_{z}|1,-1> = <1,-1|\frac{-h}{\sqrt{5}}|1,-1>
  • <1,1|L_{z}|1,1> = <1,1|\frac{h}{\sqrt{5}}|1,1>

So, L_{z}=\frac{-h}{\sqrt{5}}+ \frac{h}{\sqrt{5}} = 0

Again, I'm not too sure if I'm right or wrong here. If someone could verify if I am or not, I'd really appreciate it. If I know where I'm going with L_{z} I can continue on with finding the probabilities, which I understand how to do.

Thanks again in advance. Any help appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone ... please?
 
Generally, your work on part 1 looks ok, but I think there are some minor errors. You wrote the wavefunction as
\psi\left(\theta,\phi\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}Y_{1,-1}\left(\theta,\phi\right) + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}Y_{1,0}\left(\theta,\phi\right)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}Y_{1,1}\left(\theta,\phi\right)

First, I suspect that the numerical coefficient of the Y1,0 term should have a denominator of √5 rather than 5.

Also, I think you need to check the numerical factors in the following:
L_{+}|1,0> = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{5}[1(1+1)-0(0+1)]^{\frac{1}{2}}h|1,1> = \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}h|1,1>

Finally, when constructing ##<\psi|## you left out the numerical coefficients contained in ##|\psi>##

For part 2, you have found the "expectation value" of ##L_z##. But that won't give you much information about what values are possible for individual measurements of ##L_z##. The only possible value that you can get for a measurement of an operator in QM is one of the eigenvalues of that operator. Note that your wavefunction is a superposition of three eigenstates of ##L_z##. Each eigenstate corresponds to a specific eigenvalue of ##L_z##.

So, what are the possible values of a measurement of ##L_z## for your wavefunction?

The numerical coefficients of each of the terms in the wavefunction have something to do with the probability of measuring a particular eigenvalue of ##L_z##.
 
Last edited:
Thanks TSny, that helped a lot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top