Quantum Numbers J,S and L in p+n and n+n system

Fluffy86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I have some problems concerning one of the exercises I got last week

Homework Statement


List the quantum numbers J,S,L (in spectroscopic notation ^{2S+1}L_J for partial waves of the n + p systemup to total angular momentum J=2
The quantum numbers J, S and L represent the total angular momentum, the total spin, and the relativ orbital momentum, repectively.
b) Repeat for the n+n system
c) Use the above information, together with the known spectroscopy of the deuteron, to explain why there are no bound states of two neutrons

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok first of all we can have S=0 or S=1. Then we go through the different L states.
With L=0: S L=1 : P L=2: D
S=0:
L=0: ^1S_0
L=1: ^1P_1
L=2: ^1D_2

Now I have some problems with the S=1 states. Let's assume we have L=1 and S=1. What values can J have. Is it the same as I learned for the electron orbits J=|L-S|..L+S? So can J be in the example be 0,1 and 2?
When yes then I get 7 additional cases
S=1
L=0: ^3S_1
L=1: ^3P_0 ^3P_1 ^3P_2
L=2: ^3D_1 ^3D_2
L=3: ^3F_2

I have really no idea if this is correct or not. But when this is true I am not sure about the second part. Now we have a n+n system, this means we have to consider the Pauli principle. Which of the combination is than not allowed any longer? Of course the ^3S_1 one, because then both have same spin. But are all S=1 states forbidden, even when they have a relative angular momentum?

In the last part the question about a bound state of 2 neutrons. I know that the ground state in the deuteron is the ^3S_1 state. This one is not allowed in the 2 neutron system, but why not the next higher state is the ground state for the 2 neutrons?(e.g. the first excited state of the deuteron)

Would be really nice if you could help me
Best regards
Fluffy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fluffy86 said:
Ok, first of all we can have S=0 or S=1. Then we go through the different L states.
With L=0: S L=1 : P L=2: D
S=0:
L=0: ^1S_0
L=1: ^1P_1
L=2: ^1D_2

Now I have some problems with the S=1 states. Let's assume we have L=1 and S=1. What values can J have. Is it the same as I learned for the electron orbits J=|L-S|..L+S? So can J be in the example be 0,1 and 2?
Yup.
When yes then I get 7 additional cases
S=1
L=0: ^3S_1
L=1: ^3P_0, ^03P_1, ^3P_2
L=2: ^3D_1, ^3D_2
L=3: ^3F_2

I have really no idea if this is correct or not.
Looks good.
But when this is true I am not sure about the second part. Now we have a n+n system, this means we have to consider the Pauli principle. Which of the combination is than not allowed any longer? Of course the ^3S_1 one, because then both have same spin. But are all S=1 states forbidden, even when they have a relative angular momentum?
The symmetry of the entire state needs to be antisymmetric for the two-neutron system. The S=1 spin state is symmetric, so the orbital part of the state needs to be antisymmetric so that the state as a whole is antisymmetric.
 
Thx alot!
Do you mean with an antisymmetric orbital part that the L has to be 1 or 3 or how do I know what symmetry the orbital part has?

Fluffy
 
Fluffy86 said:
Do you mean with an antisymmetric orbital part that the L has to be 1 or 3 or how do I know what symmetry the orbital part has?
Yes, that's what I meant. I'm not sure how you'd subsequently rule those states out for the n-n system though.
 
hmm maybe it is possible to argue with the parity, the relative orbital momentum gives (-1)^l so in the n+n system and S=1 l has to be an odd number and in the S=0 and even number?
Or am I thinking totally wrong?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top