Quantum: Photon strikes Electron.

AI Thread Summary
A 120nm photon collides with an electron, causing the electron to move forward while the photon rebounds. The discussion involves calculating the initial speed of the electron and the wavelength of the rebounding photon using relevant equations. Initial attempts at solving the equations led to incorrect results due to algebraic errors and unit inconsistencies. After identifying the mistakes, the correct approach involved using the quadratic formula for accurate calculations. The problem emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in physics problems.
Yashir1992
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A 120nm photon strikes an electron in a head on collison causing the elctron to be moved in the forward direction and the photon to rebound directly back.
A. Calculate the inital speed of the Electron after colison.
B. Calculate the wavelength of the rebounding Photon.




E=H/f
E = W+Ek
p= H/Wavelength


Givens: C= 3.0x10^8m/s
H = 6.63x10^-34J*S


Although the problem being linear simplifies it a bit, i still had trouble with it. so here i go.

Equation one.
E(prime)= HC/Wavelength - 1/2mv^2
HC/Wavelength(prime) = HC/Wavelength - 1/2mv^2

Equation two.
HC/Wavelength(prime) = -HC/Wavelength + Cmv

Therefore
HC/Wavelength - 1/2mv^2 = -HC/Wavelength + Cmv

Rearranged this makes: (some parts already calculated for simplicity sake)
3.32x10^-8J / (c)(m^2)(2) = v+v^2
3.32x10^-8J / 4.98x10^-52 = v+v^2
6.67x10^59 = v+v^2
Squareroot(6.67x10^59/2) = v
5.77x10^29 = v
But this answer must be wrong since its going way faster then the speed of light.
maybe some clarification on where i went wrong or if i made some silly math error would be awesome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first two equations look good, but something went awry after you rearranged. The right side isn't correct because the units don't work out. You can't add v to v^2. There's probably a factor of c missing. Not surprisingly, the units on the left side look messed up too.

Your setup looks good, but I think you made an algebra mistake somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, iv just figured out that you had to use a Quadratic formula instead of rearanging. i found my mistake and corrected it and answered the question the right way, but thanks for taking a look at it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top