Quantum Physics and photoelectrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion covers calculations related to quantum physics and photoelectrons. The wavelength of light illuminating a metal with a work function of 2.40 eV and a stopping potential of 2.50 V is determined to be 391 nm. The lowest frequency of light required to release electrons from a metal with a work function of 2.80 eV is calculated as 4.23 x 10^14 Hz. For gold, with a work function of 4.82 eV and illuminated by ultraviolet light at 160 nm, the maximum kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons is found to be 2.62 eV, and the threshold frequency is 7.59 x 10^14 Hz. The calculations utilize fundamental equations of quantum mechanics to derive these values.
WAHEEDA
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
here are another questions,I need someone to help me!
(1)A metal work a work function of 2.40 eV is illuminated with a beam of monochromatic light.The stopping potential for the emmited electrons is 2.50 V.What is the wavelength of the light in nanometer?
(2)What is the lowest frequency of light that can cause the release of electrons from a metal that has a work function of 2.80 eV?
(3)Gold has a work function of 4.82 eV.If a block of gold is illuminated with ultraviolet light (wavelength=160nm), what are
(a) the maximum kinetic energy (in electron volts) of emmited photoelectrons
(b) the threshold frequency?

please help me!I need the answers by this monday,29th november :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) The wavelength of the light in nanometers is 1240. (2) The lowest frequency of light that can cause the release of electrons from a metal with a work function of 2.80 eV is 4.48 x 10^15 Hz. (3a) The maximum kinetic energy (in electron volts) of emmited photoelectrons is 2.62 eV. (3b) The threshold frequency is 7.59 x 10^14 Hz.
 


(1) To find the wavelength of the light, we can use the equation: E = hc/λ, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s), c is the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the light.

First, we need to find the energy of the photon using the given work function and stopping potential. The energy of the photon can be calculated by subtracting the stopping potential from the work function: E = 2.50 V - 2.40 eV = 0.10 eV.

Next, we need to convert the energy from electron volts (eV) to joules (J) by multiplying by the conversion factor 1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV. So, 0.10 eV = 0.10 x 1.602 x 10^-19 J = 1.602 x 10^-20 J.

Now, we can plug in the values into the equation: 1.602 x 10^-20 J = (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s)(3 x 10^8 m/s)/λ

Solving for λ, we get: λ = 6.626 x 10^-34 J*s x 3 x 10^8 m/s / 1.602 x 10^-20 J = 3.91 x 10^-7 m = 391 nm.

Therefore, the wavelength of the light is 391 nm.

(2) The lowest frequency of light that can cause the release of electrons from a metal with a work function of 2.80 eV can be found using the same equation as above, but this time we are solving for the frequency (f) instead of the wavelength (λ). The equation for frequency is: E = hf. Rearranging the equation, we get: f = E/h.

Substituting the values, we get: f = 2.80 eV / 6.626 x 10^-34 J*s = 4.23 x 10^14 Hz.

Therefore, the lowest frequency of light that can cause the release of electrons is 4.23 x 10^14 Hz.

(3) (a) To find the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons, we can use
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top