Quantum Physics: Determining Planck's Constant and Work Function

AI Thread Summary
In a photoelectric experiment, light striking a metal surface ejects photoelectrons, creating a measurable current. A reverse potential is applied until the current reaches zero, known as the stopping potential, with specific values recorded for various light frequencies. The discussion centers on determining Planck's constant and the work function of the metal using the photoelectric effect formulas. Participants emphasize the need for users to demonstrate their understanding of the concepts before seeking help with formulas. Key formulas include the relationship between maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons and the stopping potential, highlighting the connection between energy and voltage in this context.
Tokimasa
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In a photoelectric experiment, light is incident on a metal surfact. Photoelectrons are ejected, producing a current. A reverse potantial is applied and adjusted until the current drops to 0 (this is called the stopping potential). This fata is collected for stopping potentials (listed first) for four different frequencies (listed second): [typo volts that reads 0,] and 2E14Hz; 0.9V and 4E14Hz; 2V and 7E14Hz; 3V and 9.3E14Hz.

Determine an experimental value for Planck's constant. What is the work function of the metal?

----------

Can someone tell me what formulas to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, we can not do that...not until you show some effort. What do you think ? Does your text not talk about the Photoelectric Effect ? Does it not give you a formula ?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=28
 
Gokul43201 said:
No, we can not do that...not until you show some effort. What do you think ? Does your text not talk about the Photoelectric Effect ? Does it not give you a formula ?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=28

Well, I'm given two formulas for Photoelectric Effect wiht little about them. The only one that I have no idea what it is states: KE[max] = eV[0]. I know that eV is electron Volts, but I don't think that's what the formula is saying.
 
Tokimasa said:
: KE[max] = eV[0]. I know that eV is electron Volts, but I don't think that's what the formula is saying.
KE(max) : maximum kinetic energy (~0.5mv^2) of ejected photoelectron
e : charge on the electron = 1.6 * 10^-19 coulombs
V(0) : applied stopping potential in volts
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top