Quantum Spin up spin down with magnetic field

mozartkart
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
There is an external magnetic field along the positive z direction B = (0,0, B) and the initial spin direction at time t0= 0 is specified by the direction cosines
Ŝ0= (cos α0, cos β0, cos γ0)
where α0, β0, γ0 are the angles between the initial spin and the x, y, z axes, respectively.
This initial spin pointing in the direction Ŝ0 can be represented in terms of spin up and down states along z direction:
ψ(α000 ) = A(α000 )α + B(α000β ) ,
What are A and B?

For the Psi= A alpha + B beta part alpha and beta represent the |+> and |-> z sates respectively.

Hey everyone on this fine night,
I really don't know where to start and was wondering if someone could give me a push in the right direction? Is this just asking what is the probability of it being up or down? I really can't get my foot out of the door on this :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A and B represent the probabilities of the spin being in the up or down states respectively. The probability of the spin being in an up state is given by A, and the probability of it being in a down state is given by B. To determine these probabilities, you can use the equations A = cos^2(α0) + cos^2(β0) + cos^2(γ0) and B = sin^2(α0) + sin^2(β0) + sin^2(γ0).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top