Question about a PD controller.

  • Thread starter Thread starter nylonman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Controller Pd
AI Thread Summary
A PD controller is used to adjust the root locus plot of a control system, allowing the complex poles to meet design specifications. The introduction of a zero affects the system's response, particularly as the leftmost pole moves toward the zero with increasing gain. While the leftmost pole can be ignored for certain calculations, its interaction with the zero is significant, as it influences the overall system dynamics. If the gain is sufficiently high, the leftmost pole can coincide with the zero, maintaining stability on the negative real axis. However, this configuration may lead to slower system response due to the pole's proximity to the right-half plane.
nylonman
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm taking a control engineering course and I've got a little doubt about PD controllers.

Here is my root locus plot: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/535/controlw.png/

I have the system defined by the poles in the root locus with some design specifications that are satisfied when the complex poles are in the same position as the green stars. In order to move the branches of the root locus a PD controller is used, so a zero appears in the plot. With a specific gain the specifications are satisfied as shown in the right plot.

My question is: the specifications are computed assuming a normalized second order system, so the transfer function of the final system would have only the two complex conjugate poles. I know that the leftmost pole can be ignored, but what about the remaining zero? Wouldn't it affect the response?

Any help will be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
When placing your two right most poles using the gain kd, your left most pole will tend to move toward the zero position at some position specified by kd also. So if you're ignoring the left most pole only, then it has the same effect of ignoring both the left most pole and the zero, since the zero is only there to assure that the pole moves towards it (As shown by the green line)
 
The zero is just an "end point" of the locus of the left most pole.

In other words, if the gain is large enough, the left most pole coincides at the zero which is still good because it sits on the negative real axis. However, system response is slower due to the pole approaching right-half plane.
 
Last edited:
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top