Question About A Simple Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter getfirefox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding how to derive the unit of work done, expressed as kg.m².s⁻², using fundamental physics equations. It emphasizes the relationships between velocity, acceleration, force, and work, specifically highlighting the need to substitute units into the work formula. The key point is to demonstrate that work can be expressed in terms of mass, distance, and time through unit substitution. Participants are seeking clarification on the process of showing this relationship. Ultimately, the focus is on the correct interpretation and manipulation of units in physics.
getfirefox
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Since velocity = distance / time, the units of velocity are metres / seconds or ms-1. Use the equations (below) to show that the unit of work done can be written as kg.m2.s-2.

acceleration = change in velocity / time
force = mass X acceleration
work done = force X distance

Homework Equations



None needed.

The Attempt at a Solution



Can anyone please explain to me what this question is asking me to do and how I might go about showing this?

Thanks guys for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
getfirefox said:

Homework Statement



Homework Equations



None needed.

The Attempt at a Solution



Can anyone please explain to me what this question is asking me to do and how I might go about showing this?

Thanks guys for your help.

It's only a question about the "kind" of units.

Just show through substitution how the units for expressing work are
Mass*distance*distance over time*time
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Relating acceleration to distance and time
Replies
5
Views
3K
(Magnetism) Magnetic pull force on a steel ball
Replies
4
Views
2K
Projectile motion, initial height and range given, find initial velocity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Transverse mechanical waves in a steel wire
Replies
10
Views
886
Solving for Work Done When Accelerating a Mass
Replies
3
Views
723
Confused about kinematic equations
Replies
20
Views
2K
Solving Distance Traveled Using Formulas vs. Graphs
Replies
6
Views
2K
Centripetal Acceleration while Swinging a Stone on a String
Replies
9
Views
1K
Velocity Formulas for Projectile Motion
Replies
10
Views
3K
Question about Projectile Motion: Throwing a Flower Pot from a Balcony
Replies
18
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top