Question about angular muon flux

safinenko
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The Gaisser parametrization is something like:

\Phi_0(E,\theta)=AE^{-\gamma}\left[ \frac{1}{1+1.1E\cos(\theta)/E_{\pi}}+\frac{0.054}{1+1.1E\cos(\theta)/E_K} \right]

where A,\gamma,E_{\pi},E_K are constants. My question is: Is this saying that at higher zenith angles the flux of muons is stronger? Is there a reason for this?

Also, would this say that the intensity would be higher at an angle than at vertical for muons crossing the same opacity(=distance)?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Safinenko
 
Physics news on Phys.org
safinenko said:
My question is: Is this saying that at higher zenith angles the flux of muons is stronger? Is there a reason for this?
The flight length is shorter, so less muons decay (or get absorbed) before they reach the ground.

Also, would this say that the intensity would be higher at an angle than at vertical for muons crossing the same opacity(=distance)?
Why?
 
Hi, thank you for your input.

mfb said:
The flight length is shorter, so less muons decay (or get absorbed) before they reach the ground.

From what I have always understood, \theta in the function was the zenith angle (angle from vertical). For example, here on top of page 3 the angle is defined from the vertical. So for \theta=0, E in the fraction is multiplied by 1; for \theta=60, E is effectively divided by half. So this leads me to think that angular muons have higher intensity than vertical. But obviously the distance muons travel vertically is shorter than at an angle!

Basically, this is the part that I am confused about.

Safinenko
 
The division by 2 indicates that the flight length doubled - you need twice the energy to counter this with time dilation. Therefore, E cos(θ) is a measure for the time the muon has to survive (in its own frame) to reach the ground.

So this leads me to think that angular muons have higher intensity than vertical.
No. If you want to make this comparison, compare muons with fixed energy.
In addition, take the solid angle into account: There is more solid angle between 79° and 80° compared to the region between 0° and 1° (as measured from the vertical axis).

If you want to take ##\phi## into account:
$$\Phi_0(E,\theta,\phi) =sin (\theta) \Phi_0(E,\theta)$$
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top