Question about Cyclical Matrices and Coplanarity of Vectors

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
MIT OCW 18.06 using Intro to Linear Algebra by Strang

So I was working through some stuff about Cyclic Matrices, and the text was talking about how the column vectors that make up this cyclic matrix, shown here,

vZxRfwJ.gif


are coplanar, and that is the reason that Ax = b will have either infinite solutions or no solutions depending on what b is; specifically whether or not b1 + b2 + b3 = 0.

I also noticed that the scalar triple product using the three vectors constructed from the columns of the matrix is of course 0, this is to be expected, but if you construct the vectors from the rows of the matrix, the scalar triple product of those vectors is also zero...

Is this just coincidence, or will sets of vectors constructed from both the columns and the rows of a cyclic matrix always be coplanar, or rather, linearly dependent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not all cyclic matrices have coplanar columns or rows and hence vanishing determinants. However, for any matrix ## A ##, cyclic or not, the following statements are equivalent:

1. det(##A##) = 0
2. The columns of A are linearly dependent

Also, because det(##A^T##)=det(##A##), if the columns of a matrix are linearly dependent, the rows will be too.
 
  • Like
Likes kostoglotov
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top