Question about electrons per shell

AI Thread Summary
The maximum number of electrons per shell follows the sequence 2, 8, 18, 32, and 50 due to the degeneracy of energy shells and the Pauli exclusion principle. Higher energy shells possess more orbitals, allowing them to accommodate more electrons, with each orbital holding a maximum of two electrons with opposite spins. The number of orbitals is determined by the angular momentum states predicted by the Schrödinger Equation, which explains why the observed pattern differs from a simpler mathematical sequence. The discussion also humorously touches on the impracticality of splitting electrons and acknowledges the presence of shells and subshells in the nucleus. Overall, the established electron configuration is rooted in quantum mechanics rather than aesthetic numerical patterns.
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
why is it the maximum electrons per shell is 2,8,18,32,50 ... Wouldn't 2,8,16,32,50 make more sense mathematically?

Are there any equations the show why this occurs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is due, first due to the degeneracy of the energy shell (i.e. how many energy states that have that shell's energy) and also due to the pauli exclusion principle.

First, the higher energy shells have bigger degeneracies. In simple terms, there are more orbitals in the n=2 shell than there are in the n=1 energy shell. Thus, they can hold more electrons. Each orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons with opposite spin due to the Pauli principle. So the end result is:

n=1 Shell: 1 orbital = 2 electrons

n=2 Shell: 4 orbitals= 8 electrons

n=3 Shell: 9 orbitals= 18 electrons

The number of orbitals is determined by the number of possible angular momentum states for the electrons in the atom, which is predicted by the Schrödinger Equation. So, while your pattern may seem nicer or more aesthetic, it is not what the Schrödinger Equation predicts, so it does not make more sense mathematically in the end.
 
Last edited:
Is this possible? n=6
71.5 electrons?
 
nuby said:
Is this possible? n=6
71.5 electrons?

That might be a bit difficult; splitting an electron in half is not something that you just do with a hammer and chisel...
 
Lol. nevermind
 
Last edited:
nucleus

dont forget that the nucleus also has shells and subshells.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top