Question about errors, Hubble's constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the weighted average of Hubble's constant values with associated statistical and systematic errors. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding correlations between systematic uncertainties before applying the weighted average formula. The key equations provided are \bar{x}=(\sum^{N}_{i=1}x_i/\sigma_i^2)/(\sum^{N}_{i=1}1/\sigma_i^2) for the weighted average and \sigma_{\bar{x}}=\sqrt{1/(\sum^{N}_{i=1}1/\sigma_i^2)} for the uncertainty. The consensus is that, in the absence of correlation data, a simplified approach using the average of the uncertainties can yield reasonable approximations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weighted averages in statistics
  • Familiarity with statistical and systematic errors
  • Knowledge of uncertainty propagation techniques
  • Basic concepts of likelihood functions in measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of weighted averages in statistical analysis
  • Learn about uncertainty propagation methods in experimental physics
  • Explore the concept of likelihood functions and their applications
  • Investigate the impact of correlated uncertainties on measurement accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and students in physics or astronomy who are involved in analyzing measurements of Hubble's constant and other cosmological parameters.

Matt atkinson
Messages
114
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am just looking through some old notes I have from for cosmology, and there's something cropped up that i can't seem to figure out:

Say I have two (or more) values for H_o each with errors such as:

H_{o_1}=70^{+a+b}_{-c-d}
and

H_{o_2}=69^{+e+f}_{-g-h}

How would I go about calculating the weighted averaged (a,c,e,g are statistical errors. The rest are systematic errors) and then uncerstainty on the weighted average when for instance a\neq c.

Homework Equations


All the formula i found are along the lines of:

\bar{x}=(\sum^{N}_{i=1}x_i/\sigma_i^2)/(\sum^{N}_{i=1}1/\sigma_i^2)

\sigma_{\bar{x}}=\sqrt{1/(\sum^{N}_{i=1}1/\sigma_i^2})

The Attempt at a Solution


I've attempted to workout the top uncertainty on it's own, and likewise with the bottom but that doesn't seem the right way to do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To do it properly, you first have to know about the correlations between the systematic uncertainties. Then you can get the likelihood functions of the individual measurements, combine them, and then extract central value and uncertainties from that again.
If you just have access to the given numbers and expect that the correlation is small, the quick and dirty weighted average should give some reasonable approximation. The uncertainty of the weighted average follows from the usual uncertainty propagation.
 
Ah okay thank you, I have just been given numbers and no correlation and been told to make an assumption. So I should say that if i assume the correlation between systematic uncertainties is small.

So to work that out, let's say I have:

76.9^{+3.9+10}_{-3.4-8}
66^{+11+9}_{-10-8}
How would I go about using that in the formula I have above for the weighted average. for instance what would I use for \sigma_1 when its values for the upper and lower uncertainties differ.
 
I would probably use the average of the upwards and downwards uncertainty for the weights. If those the uncertainties are too asymmetric, this simplified approach will fail anyway.
 
Okay thankyou! ill give it a try now, i did have attempt at doing each on their own it gave a strange result so ill try taking the average.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K