Question about Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic friction coefficient (mu_k) for a block in translation equilibrium at a 28-degree angle, the normal force and frictional force must be determined using the equation F_fk = mu_k * F_n. The calculated mu_k value is approximately 0.53, while the reference site lists it as 0.44, highlighting a discrepancy. It is clarified that the coefficient of static friction (mu_s) is typically higher than mu_k because overcoming inertia requires more force than maintaining motion. When measuring friction coefficients, mu_s is observed when the object begins to move, while mu_k is measured during constant velocity motion. To find mu_k, equate the frictional force to the force acting down the incline when the object is already in motion.
Physics197
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Run a trial with an angle of 28 degrees so the block is in translation equilibrium. Show how to calculate the mu_k value.
http://www.lon-capa.org/~mmp/applist/si/plane.htm

Homework Equations



F_fk = mu_k * F_n

The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved for Normal force and the frictional force and plugged them into the equation to get the coefficient of friction, I get roughly 0.53.
However, on the site given above, to get it in rough equilibrium, the mu_k is 0.44 while the mu_s is roughly 0.53

Just wondering, if an object is in equilibrium, are both coefficients the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The coefficient of static friction will pretty much always be larger, the reason being that it's harder to get something moving than to keep it moving.

If it's in equilibrium and you're measuring the coefficient of friction by when it begins to move, that's the static coefficient. If it's moving and you're trying to measure when it's moving at a constant velocity, that's going to be the kinetic coefficient. Does that help?
 
Yes that does help, Thanks

But any ideas on how to solve for it?
 
Solve for which? Static or kinetic coefficient?
 
Kinetic
 
Okay, well think about it. The simplest way to find that is to set the frictional force equal to the force down the incline. What would have to be the case for you to be able to do that if the object is already moving?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top