Question about rotation w/ an additioanl object.

  • Thread starter Thread starter hakujin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
A rotating disk with a weight at the edge experiences changes in angular velocity (ω) when the weight moves closer to the center due to the conservation of angular momentum. As the distance decreases, the moment of inertia reduces, causing ω to increase if no external torques are applied. The initial torque or force required to maintain rotation is influenced by the mass distribution, particularly the mass at the edge. Understanding the relationship between torque, force, and angular momentum is crucial for solving these types of problems. The discussion highlights the importance of considering energy input and the effects of mass distribution on rotation dynamics.
hakujin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
First, while this is "homework" related I'm not seeking any direct answers. I'm stuck on a concept that I'm not sure even exists.

In short I've got a rotating disk with a weight at the edge with "an initial" ω. If that object was to decrease the distance towards the center, would the ω change and if so why?

The phrase "an initial" led me to believe that there was a starting force or torque which would remain constant which was required to not only rotate the mass of the disk but compensate for the mass at the edge of the disk. If that's true, given the mass at the edge has any factor at all on the needed initial energy/force/torque, I couldn't figure out how to calculate it. I check over my book and am completely missing it.

I assumed the mass at the edge would have be a factor since it's basically a m*g*d Newton force down (since the disk is horizontal in this situation), but I don't know how to calculate the needed force to create the initial ω.

I figured it would be something to the effect of... g[(mass of the disk)+(mass of the object*distance)] but that's the best I've got since mainly what we've done is bridge based problems an rotation around a fixed point.

If anything, a jumping off point on terminology to look up would be a big help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a rigid mass distribution is rotated about anywhere other than the center of mass, then it will wobble unless there is a balancing force applied. In 3D the disk+mass will also try to precess. This is how wheel-balancing machines (you know: when you get a new tire fitted?) work.

It would be an easier problem if there were two small masses on the rim, diametrically opposite each other, and they were both drawn closer to the center at the same time... so I suspect that you are overthinking things.

I suppose you need to decide if energy is being supplied to the configuration.
 
If that object was to decrease the distance towards the center, would the ω change and if so why?
Assuming your disk is fixed to rotate in the horizontal plane around its geometric center, without external torques, ω would increase as the moment of inertia reduces and the product of both is conserved.
 
That was my take - it's the ice-skater demo all over again.
When I was a kid there was this huge round-a-bout that we'd push up to speed then jump on. We'd start close to the edge and walk all over it ... I'm picturing something like that with a kid as the small mass.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top