Question about the Heisenberg Picture

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've seen this example for using the Heisenberg equation of motion to solve the Simple Hamonic Oscillator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg_picture#Commutator_relations"

However, if you were only interested in one variable, let's say position, on how the the position operator varies in time and its resulting expectation values: Would is it necessary to find and solve the equation of motion for P as well?

Also once one has the relevant equation of potion:

\frac{dX(t)}{dt} = \frac{p(0)}{m}

Why is it so often solved by differentiating the equation a second time and solving, rather than just integrating?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations for the SHO are
\begin{align*}
\dot{x}(t) &= \frac{p(t)}{m} \\
\dot{p}(t) &= -m\omega^2x(t)
\end{align*}Note that you have functions of time on both sides of the equations. You don't have p(0) on the right-hand side of the x equation. You differentiate one equation and substitute in the second one to get rid of one of the functions. The resulting second-order equation is straightforward to solve.
 
Thanks for the reply, Vela.

I was thinking about it earlier as I walked the dog, but hadn't got around to sitting down with it. I did wonder if assuming that the answer in the commutator was p(0) was unfounded.

Glad to have someone confirm it and that'd I'm not a complete idiot, just a bit slow :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top