Question from Boyd's Optimization Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter newphysist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Optimization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical expression from Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization," specifically regarding the supremum of a quadratic form constrained by a norm. The user is seeking clarification on the equality involving the supremum of u^TP_i^Tx under the constraint ||u||_2 ≤ 1, suggesting it relates to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Other participants confirm that the expression indeed follows from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, emphasizing its role in deriving the result. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these foundational concepts in optimization. Overall, the discussion aids in clarifying a specific mathematical concept from Boyd's work.
newphysist
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading Convex Optimization from Stephen Boyd's book on my own and I am stuck at math he mentions on Pg. 157 of his book which can be found here.

How does he write the following:

sup{uTP^{T}_{i}x | ||u||2 ≤ 1} = ||P^{T}_{i}x||2

Thanks guys
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top