Question in analytical geometry

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
The point (1, 0) is on a circle, which center is on the line y = -2x. The line 3x + 4y + 15 = 0 is a tangent to the circle. Find the equation(s) for the circle(s).

Thanks,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The equation of a circle is (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2.

The centre is on the line y = -2x, which means b = -2a, hence our circle has the equation:

(x - a)^2 + (y - (-2a))^2 = r^2
<=>
(x - a)^2 + (y + 2a)^2 = r^2

Since (1, 0) was on the circle:

(1 - a)^2 + (0 + 2a)^2 = r^2
<=>
r^2 = 5a^2 - 2a + 1

Putting that back into the equation of our circle:

(x - a)^2 + (y + 2a)^2 = 5a^2 - 2a + 1 ... (1)

We know that (1) must intersect with 3x + 4y + 15 = 0 somewhere, find that point. We know that at that point, the derivative of our circle's equation with respect to x must be -3/4 (i.e the slope of the tangent line), which gives us an equation where we can solve for a.

But I'll be damned if I'm going to do all those nasty calculations by hand ;) I worked them out with my computer, which gave a = -2 and a = 1, so the equations of the circles might be these:

(x - 1)^2 + (y + 2)^2 = 4
(x + 2)^2 + (y - 4)^2 = 25

They seem to work...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for solving this. We are actually not allowed to use things like derivative calculations in this type of questions, so I took a different approach. But the answers are the same so I'm happy. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top