Question on a Gauss's Law problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving Gauss's Law problems, specifically questions 007 and 008 related to charge calculations in cylindrical geometries. For question 007, the user incorrectly integrated the charge density, leading to an erroneous electric field calculation. In question 008, the user calculated the enclosed charge per unit height of the inner cylinder but misapplied the surface area for charge density, resulting in an incorrect answer. Key insights include the importance of correctly defining the volume element and ensuring unit consistency in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and volume integrals
  • Knowledge of charge density and its relation to electric field calculations
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Gauss's Law for cylindrical symmetry
  • Study the calculation of electric fields using Gauss's Law in various geometries
  • Learn about the concept of charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Practice solving problems involving cylindrical shells and integration in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Gauss's Law and charge distribution in cylindrical systems.

dliu1004
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: I understand the basics of Gauss's Law and how to solve some of the simpler problems, but I cannot seem to solve these two questions.

1644710266918.png
1644710275592.png

For question 007, one of my friends told me I had to ignore the outer shell? I did that: I integrated rho dV: (6.02*r*pi*r^2*h) from r=0 to r=.0462 and set that equal to epsilon(naught)*E*2pi*0.188*h (this is: epsilon(naught) * the closed integral of E dA) and solved for E. Yet, this was incorrect.

For question 008, I calculated the total enclosed charge per unit height of the inner cylinder per meter by integrating rho dV from r=0 to r=.0462. I got something like q(enc)=0.00002154*h, so that means the charge of the inner surface of the hollow cylinder must be -0.00002154*h, right? I then divided that by the surface area of the inner surface, which was 2*pi*.117*h to get charge per unit area, yet, this was also incorrect.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dliu1004 said:
For question 007, one of my friends told me I had to ignore the outer shell? I did that: I integrated rho dV: (6.02*r*pi*r^2*h) from r=0 to r=.0462

So, your integrand for calculating the charge Q on a length ##h## of the inner cylinder is (including the ##dr##) $$(6.02 \frac{C}{m^4}) r \pi r^2 h dr$$

Note that overall, this does not have the units of charge since ##r \pi r^2 h dr## has units of ##m^5##. I think the problem is with the ##\pi r^2## part of your expression.

What is the volume of a thin cylindrical shell of inner radius ##r##, outer radius ##r+dr##, and length ##h##?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Orodruin and PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K