Question on electron-positron scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morgoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Morgoth
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Well I am sure this is a lame question, but I am stuck over it for hours. I'm working on Bjorken, Drell book, and I'm trying to calculate the extreme relativistic differential cross section for electron-positron scattering.

Well, I have evaluated the cross section up to my attachment's form...


Then it says in order to keep working we choose the center-of-mass frame system, and gives us the inner products of p1,p1',-q1,-q1'

p1p1'=q1q1'=2E2sin2(θ/2)
p1(-q1')=p1'(-q1)=2Ε2
p1(-q1)=p1'(-q1')=2Ε2cos2(θ/2)

However that way I can calculate the quantities on the numerator, but I don't know how to work with the denominator...
could someone just tell me how i can find the 4-components of ps and qs?
 

Attachments

  • positronelectron.png
    positronelectron.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 587
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
why don't you involve the on-shell condition for denominators i.e like p12=m2 also expanding in the denominator you will have the terms which can be filled up by the relation you already wrote
 
Just to clarify what andrien means:

Take the first term, the denominator is (p'-p_1)^2 = p'^2 + p_1^2 - 2 (p' \cdot p_1).

In the relativistic limit we can ignore the light masses, since the p's are on-shell, which means p^2 = m^2, but in the relativistic limit that goes to zero.
So that denominator becomes \frac{-1}{2 p' \cdot p_1} which you have above in terms of energy.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top