Question on relative velocity (High school motion)

AI Thread Summary
Sue's rowing speed of 4.5 m/s is measured in still water, while the river's current flows at 2.5 m/s. When rowing against the current, her effective velocity relative to the land is 2 m/s, not 0.5 m/s backward as initially thought. The key is understanding that her rowing speed remains 4.5 m/s relative to the water, which is essential for calculating her overall motion. The analogy of a moving sidewalk illustrates how relative velocities work in different frames of reference.
KVS1999
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sue rows her boat at 4.5ms. The velocity of the river flow is 2.5ms. What is sues velocity against the flow relative to the water. I can't wrap my head around the question, since sues actual velocity against the flow is 2ms. This should mean she is moving backwards 0.5ms every 2ms she moves forwards right? Then how can the answer be sue distances 4.5ms from the waters perspective? I don't get it.[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can help to draw a picture. Recognise that the 4.5 m/s is relative to still water. So, when Sue is rowing against a 2 m/s current (relative to the land), her net forward velocity is 2.5 m/s relative to the land.

Think of an analogy of a moving sidewalk that moves at 3 m/s. If you walk at 1 m/s (relative to still, ordinary floors) you will travel at 2m/s if you walk against the moving sidewalk and at 4 m/s if you walk with it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top