Find Spring Constant: Prove 1/K_eff = 1/k_1 + 1/k_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
AI Thread Summary
To prove the relationship 1/K_eff = 1/k_1 + 1/k_2 for a system with two springs, consider the forces acting on each spring, where F1 = -k1*x1 and F2 = -k2*x2. The total force must equal zero, leading to the equation F1 + F2 = 0, which implies that the force on both springs is equal. By expressing the resultant force as F_r = -K_eff*(x1 + x2), the relationship can be established. The discussion emphasizes that the effective spring constant K_eff can be derived by recognizing that the force is consistent across both springs, allowing for the application of the combined displacement. Understanding this principle simplifies the process of finding K_eff.
Fanta
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Finding the given spring constant

Homework Statement




Consider the system represented on the figure, constituted by the mass m and two springs of constant k1 and k2.
(The image is attached)
Prove that:

\frac{1}{K_{eff}} = \frac{1}{k_{1}} + \frac{1}{k_{2}}

Homework Equations



F = -kx

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to begin. I have to consider two different displacements: One for the first spring, and one for the second.
I think, but I am not sure, that I can consider both forces are equal.
So:

F1 = -k_{1} x_{1}

F2 = -k_{2} x_{2}

and

1)

F1 + F2 = 0

and a resultant force =

F_{r} = -k_{eff} x

2)

x = x1 + x2

I tried making a system with equations 2 and 1, but I am getting nowhere. Can anyone help?
 

Attachments

  • Sem título.JPG
    Sem título.JPG
    6 KB · Views: 378
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on both springs are equal i.e. F1=F2

Now the force on one spring is also equal to keff(x1+x2).

I think you can now find keff
 
rock.freak667 said:
Now the force on one spring is also equal to keff(x1+x2).

can you explain why is that so, please?
 
Fanta said:
can you explain why is that so, please?

The force on the spring should be the same throughout.
 
Like this i found it easy to do, thanks.

but isn't that the force for both springs combined?
I mean, you have the total displacement, and the Keff.

Or I can choose any of the springs, say F1 = Keff(x1+x2) ?
 
Last edited:
Fanta said:
Like this i found it easy to do, thanks.

but isn't that the force for both springs combined?
I mean, you have the total displacement, and the Keff.

Or I can choose any of the springs, say F1 = Keff(x1+x2) ?

You can choose any spring and it should work out.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top