Question on the derivation of Intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of intensity (I) for electromagnetic waves, specifically how I = Watts/m^2 relates to I = u c, where "u" represents energy density. The derivation involves considering a cylinder with a cross-sectional area A, through which the wave travels a distance c in one second. By analyzing the energy content in a volume ΔV and the energy passing through a surface ΔA over a time interval Δt, the relationship between intensity and energy density becomes clearer. The final step uses the definition of intensity to confirm the derivation. This explanation clarifies the connection between intensity and energy density in electromagnetic waves.
Blastrix91
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When deriving the intensity of an electromagnetic wave in my textbook, there was a part I didn't quite get.

It's how I = Watts/m^2 becomes I= u c

My textbook gave an example of a electromagnetic wave through a cylinder, with cross-section area A. In 1 second it would have traveled length c. Now that makes sense.

It then proceed with changing the cross-section area with 1 and by that derives I= u c.. ? I don't get it.

Homework Equations



I = Watts/m^2
I= u c

The Attempt at a Solution


So can anybody help me conceptualise this derivation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"u" is energy density, right? So, for a given volume ΔV you can find the energy content of it, using the relation ΔE = u ΔV. Ok, so far?

If yes, then consider a given surface ΔA and try to find the energy passed through it for some time interval Δt. That amount of energy, after leaving the surface, wouldn't be accumulated in a volume ΔV = ΔA (c Δt)?

If the above makes sence, then use the definition of intensity (I = ΔE/(ΔA Δt) to get the desired result.
 
Great. Yeah, that was clear. I'm grateful ^^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top