Question on tourques and static equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
Determining when to use the sum of forces versus the sum of torques depends on the specific problem and the number of unknowns involved. In the case of a ladder leaning against a wall, both net torque and net force must equal zero for static equilibrium. A free body diagram can help identify the forces acting on the ladder, including the force from the wall and the force from the floor. It is essential to consider both vertical and horizontal components separately to solve for unknown forces. Using multiple equations is often necessary to find a solution in complex scenarios like this.
sodr2
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
How do you know when to use the sum of all forces acting on a body compared to the sum of all tourques acting on a body when solving for these types of questions involving ladders, hanging signs, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends on the specific quantity you are asked to solve for and how many unknowns there are. Sometimes you need both; sometimes one will do. Whenever there's an extended body, be ready to consider torques.
 
Ill go ahead and give you the question I have been working on:

A ladder which is 4 meters long masses 40 kg and has its centre of gravity 1.5 m up along its length, leans against a frictionless wall and rests on a frictionless floor. To keep it from slipping, it is tied to the wall with a rope which is attached to the ladder at its center of gravity.

and between the ladder and the rope is the center of gravity Fg [ down]

the angle is 53 degrees. Find all forces acting upon the ladder..

from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...​
 
Last edited:
from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...

Forces causes linear acceleration, torques cause angular acceleration. In this case, both net torque and net force need to sum to zero.

I'd start by drawing a diagram--in fact, it might help to just draw a regular free body diagram and ignore where the forces act (don't deal with torque). See if you can figure out any of the unknown forces from that.​
 
sodr2 said:
from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...​

Well, that's just one of the conditions for equilibrium (Net Torque = 0). Sometimes one is enough, but usually it's not. Make use of the the other conditions: Net Force = 0.

Here you have three unknown forces to find, so you need at least three equations. (Hint: Consider vertical and horizontal force components separately.)

Don't be stingy with the equations. No extra charge for using more than one! :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top