Question Regarding Momentum Lab

  • Thread starter Thread starter bleedblue1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a momentum lab experiment involving two carts, where one cart is stationary and the other is launched into it. A question arises about the necessity of considering scenarios where both carts move towards each other or where a previously stationary cart becomes active. Participants express confusion, suggesting that the principle of relative velocities implies that conservation of momentum holds true in all cases. It is clarified that both conservation of momentum and energy are applicable in any inertial frame due to Galilean Relativity. Understanding these principles reinforces the validity of momentum conservation in various scenarios.
bleedblue1234
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We recently did a momentum lab in my AP Physics B class that involved a track with two carts. 1 of the carts was stationary on the track and the other was launched into it. We used sonar detectors at both ends of the tracks to find the velocity (and eventually calculate the momentum)...

My question is that on my lab I have a question that states: Why don't we need to take into account a case where the two carts would be rolling towards each other or the passive cart rams into the stationary (once active) cart to verify the law of conservation of linear momentum?

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it had something to do with velocities being relative, and thus momentums being relative, therefore it is true in all cases? I am just a little confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bleedblue1234! :smile:
bleedblue1234 said:
… I have a question that states: Why don't we need to take into account a case where the two carts would be rolling towards each other or the passive cart rams into the stationary (once active) cart to verify the law of conservation of linear momentum?

I thought it had something to do with velocities being relative, and thus momentums being relative, therefore it is true in all cases? I am just a little confused...

Yes, I'm a little confused too …

it seems to be begging the question.

Anyway, both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy work equally well in any inertial frame …

in other words, Galilean Relativity applies to inertial frames.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top