Question regarding mutual inductance of two coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding mutual inductance and flux linkage between two coils. The initial query highlights confusion regarding flux linkage calculations, specifically the distinction between single turn and multiple turns. Participants clarify that the correct formula for flux linkage involves multiplying the number of turns by the magnetic flux. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding inductance and its relationship with current and flux. Overall, the participants provide guidance on resolving the initial question and improving comprehension of the topic.
Sanosuke Sagara
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I have my question,solution and the problem I faced in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Please , I really need someone help me figure out where I have done wrong.
 
Sanosuke Sagara said:
Please , I really need someone help me figure out where I have done wrong.

I think you did everything correct. The flux linkage is: N\Phi not \Phi (this is only for 1 turn, not the entire coil). So for coil 1 you get:

N\Phi=100*(1.5*10^{-6})=150\mu WB

and coil 2:

N\Phi=200*(9*10^{-8})=18 \mu WB
 
Last edited:
Sanosuke Sagara said:
I have my question,solution and the problem I faced in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
I take it that you are having problems with the flux linkage questions because you seem to have figured out the induced voltages. You may want to ask some engineers about flux linkage. It is a concept used more in engineering, but I will give it a shot.

Flux linkage is a measure of how much magnetic field produced by the coil is enclosed by the coil windings. It seems to be a relationship between flux enclosed by the coil and the actual current - I think. Inductance expressed in terms of the actual current I is

(1) L = nB\cdot A/I

where n is the number of windings, B the magnetic field in the coil and A the cross-sectional area.

The term \lambda = nB\cdot A is called the flux linkage.

But since you are given L and I, you can work out flux linkage from (1).

Does that help?

AM
 
Thanks for your help ,Andrew Mason and learningphysics.I now can understand with the question already.
 
Sanosuke Sagara said:
Thanks for your help ,Andrew Mason and learningphysics.I now can understand with the question already.

I think an easier way to answer part a) is just to use the definition of inductance.

L_1=N_1\Phi_1/I_1
25*10^{-3}=100(\Phi_1)/6*10^{-3}
\Phi_1=1.5*10^{-6}
N\Phi_1=100(1.5*10^{-6})=150 \mu WB
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top