Question regarding unit normal of some function

keensaj
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing.
Please can you help me with this question.

A surface h in the three dimensions is given by the equation z=g(x,y)

Find the unit normal at any point h in two separate ways:

a)By identifying h with an equipotential for some scalar field φ to be determined and computing ∇φ.

b)By expressing the points of h in parametric form r(x, y) and computing ∂r/dx × ∂r/dy

I think that you have to write h(x,y,z)=xi+yj+g(x,y)k
but can someone explain what a) means
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keensaj said:
Please can you help me with this question.

A surface h in the three dimensions is given by the equation z=g(x,y)

Find the unit normal at any point h in two separate ways:

a)By identifying h with an equipotential for some scalar field φ to be determined and computing ∇φ.

b)By expressing the points of h in parametric form r(x, y) and computing ∂r/dx × ∂r/dy

I think that you have to write h(x,y,z)=xi+yj+g(x,y)k
but can someone explain what a) means
thanks
This article explains the mechanics behind calculating ∇φ and how that can be used to find the unit normal to a surface:

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DirectionalDeriv.aspx

BTW, ∇φ is called the 'gradient' of the function φ.

The symbol ∇ is known as an 'operator' and means ∇ = ∂ / ∂x + ∂ / ∂y + ∂ / ∂z

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient

Much of this won't make sense if you haven't studied some elementary vector calculus.
 
If z= g(x,y), then \phi(x,y,z)= z- g(x,y)= 0, a constant. That is the "equipotential" referred to in (a). Since g is a constant function, it gradient, \nabla \phi= \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\vec{j}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}\vec{k}, is perpendicular to surface at every point.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top