Question with gravity, speed, heights

  • Thread starter Thread starter ital_dj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a pebble fired from a slingshot, focusing on concepts of gravity, speed, and height. The key equations discussed include the conversion of kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy, specifically mgh = 1/2mv^2, leading to the formula h = v^2/(2g) for calculating maximum height. The participants clarify that the mass of the pebble is irrelevant for height calculations when using this formula. The maximum height for the 60g pebble fired at 35m/s is calculated to be approximately 61.25 meters. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in projectile motion.
ital_dj
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] question with gravity, speed, heights

Homework Statement


a boy fires a 60g pebble with his slingshot. the pebble leaves the slingshot at 35m/s.
a) how high above the slingshot will the pebble rise if it is fired straight up?
b) if the pebble is fired so that it goes in an arc and has a speed of 10m/s at its maximum height, what will the maximum height be?
c) at what speed would an 80g pebble have to be fired to reach the same height as the pebble in (a)? Assume that the 80g pebble is also fired straight up.


Homework Equations


I'm just going to guess some relevant equations, because I'm so lost.
d = vt
F = mg
Eg = mg\Deltah


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried basic multiplication, division, and other stuff... couldn't figure it out

You're help is greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot

EDIT: I just looked at the teacher's solution that she wrote, and it was mgh = \frac{mv_{1}^{2}}{2}, but how did she arrive at that? Thanks
Also, from that equation it gets narrowed down to h = \frac{v_1^2}{2g}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure you copied the solution correctly? remember that when the pebble is shot straight up and reaches its maximum height that 100% of its kinetic energy will have been converted into gravitational potential energy.
 
Sorry, you're right... it should be divided by 2... I'll fix it right now. But, with the correct solution now, how did she arrive at that?
 
what is the equation for kinetic energy? what is the equation for gravitational potential energy?
 
BishopUser said:
what is the equation for kinetic energy? what is the equation for gravitational potential energy?

Kinetic Energy = 1/2mv^2
Gravitational Energy (Eg) = mg\Deltah
 
i guess max height which is required in prblm (a) = u^2/2g

u = initial velocity = 35

so max height = 61.25 m i think we don't need mass here o.O I'm confused too...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top