Quick Potential Barrier tunnelling question

Novocaine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am dealing with the classic problem of a potential barrier of finite width, with a particle tunneling through, in the case of E < V.

I am to calculate the transmission/reflection coefficients, and we first start off with the wavefunctions for the three regions.

Before the barrier, we have Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx)

In the barrier, we have Cexp(k1x) + Dexp(-k1x)

After the barrier, we have Fexp(kx).

My only question about this is where the i term comes from. It is probably a very simple answer but I want to know exactly its reason before I go on past this point. In the case of E > V, the i term appears in all the exponentials. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It comes from the soloution to the second order ordninary differential equation.

Try to see how these wave functions comes, when solving the shrodinger equation for the different regions for your potentia:

"Before the barrier, we have Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx)

In the barrier, we have Cexp(k1x) + Dexp(-k1x)

After the barrier, we have Fexp(kx)."
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
698
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top