Quick question about Simple Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the notation used for simple harmonic motion in a physics GRE study book. The user notes that the book uses "p" instead of "\omega" for angular frequency, leading to misunderstandings in the equations presented. It is clarified that both "p" and "\omega" represent the same physical quantity, although the notation is considered poor. The user is encouraged to rewrite the formulas using "\omega" for clarity and to create a personal formula sheet for better understanding. Overall, the inconsistency in notation can lead to confusion, but it is manageable with careful attention to the definitions.
Dr. Mirrage
I'm going to dispense with the provided template for this, I hope no one minds.

I always understood that for simple harmonic motion there was this equation:
\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}

However, I recently got a book that helps you study for the Physics GRE (Graduate Record Examination).
There is a quick review in there covering all the material that you should learn as an undergraduate physics student. However, it just made me confused when I got to this part about Simple Harmonic Motion, because they write the above equation as:
p^{2} = \frac{k}{m}
which is basically the exact same thing except they have "p" instead of "\omega" which is "momentum" instead of "angular frequency", right?
Furthermore, they proceed to cause more confusion for me by writing things like:
x = x_{m} sin(pt + \phi)
shouldn't it be "\omega t" instead of "pt"?

So I was thinking maybe they just use the character "p" for "angular frequency", but then the very next equation I see in the book is: Period = T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}
I know that equation is correct, and they definitely used the character "omega" for "angular frequency"..

I've then been trying to show that p = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} = \omega But have so far been unsuccessful.
I would be very grateful if someone could help me sort this out. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the template doesn't apply, it's probably not a homework question, is it? :wink:

Anyway, the equations you've got there only make sense if p is angular frequency. So I would just assume that p = \omega, i.e. that they are using both letters for the same physical quantity. It's bad notation, but what can you do...

Actually you could rewrite the formulas to use \omega, so they look right to you. Making your own formula sheet (even if you can't use it on the test) is a good practice in general.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top