Quick Question on maximum pressure change in a stationary wave

AI Thread Summary
Antinodes are typically associated with maximum amplitude in stationary waves, but confusion arises regarding pressure change. Nodes, where particle velocity is zero, actually experience the greatest pressure change due to alternating density. In contrast, at the ends of the tube, molecules exhibit maximum velocity but no change in pressure. This distinction clarifies that the greatest pressure change occurs at nodes, despite their lack of movement. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping wave behavior in stationary systems.
qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I always thought antinodes were the areas of greatest pressure change as they shift to and fro, reaching maximum amplitudes at both sides. However, one of the questions asked me and the answer says that nodes are the areas of greatest pressure change.

Can anyone help? I am confused with this. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like they are calling nodes the locations of zero velocity, which is where the pressure change is greatest.
 
But 0 velocity=greatest pressure change?

Im really confused.
 
Sorry about the delayed reply, it is difficult to explain this further without figures. I found this, which helps show what I'm talking about:
http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14e/stlwaves.htm

On that page, "both sides open" should be selected. We'll look at two parts of the tube, the center and the ends.

At the center of the tube: the molecules do not move at the very center, so velocity is zero. However, you'll also notice that the molecules surrounding the center alternate between bunching together and spreading apart. So the pressure (which corresponds directly with the density or closeness of the molecules) has a maximum change there.

At the ends of the tube, the molecules are moving back and forth with maximum velocity change. However, their spacing stays the same, indicating zero change in pressure.

Hope that helps!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top