Quick question on Newton, gravity and planetary movement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravitational force and acceleration in the context of planetary movement, specifically focusing on the inverse square law and its implications for elliptical orbits. The original poster seeks clarification on the meaning of a negative sign in the acceleration formula and the validity of the equivalence between force and acceleration expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the significance of the negative sign in the acceleration formula and the relationship between constants in the equations. Some participants provide insights into the directionality of acceleration and its implications for gravitational force.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the negative sign in relation to gravitational attraction and discussing the nature of constants in the equations. There is a mix of clarifications and corrections being offered, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating terminology and concepts in physics, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of their statements. The original poster mentions challenges with writing physics in English, indicating potential barriers to clear communication.

Contadoren11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi,

I've been tasked with showing that the length of vector F_gravity is inversely proportional with radius squared (i.e. |F_vector|=c/r^2) and is central, i.e. consistently directed toward the same point. Apparently, this is the same as (<=>) the acceleration of a particle following an elliptical path being radial (and thus, directed towards the same point as F) *and* it being equal to

a_r = - C/r (1)

where C is a universal constant.

C ends up being 4*π^2*(a^3/T^2), i.e. positive.

My questions are: Why is there a minus in (1), and what is the explanation for the <=> being valid? I realize it's Newtons 2nd law, but the constants C and c could conceivably differ by more than m, no?

Apologies for the shoddy notions, not used to doing physics in english (or writing formulas outside of Word...)

Homework Equations


|F_vector|=k*1/r^2 and central
<=>
a_r = - C*1/r (1)

where C is a universal constant. C ends up being 4*π^2*(a^3/T^2), i.e. positive.

The Attempt at a Solution


Can't figure it out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The minus sign is because the acceleration is towards the origin, the point r is measured from, so tends to reduce r.
I don't see that it matters that the constants can be different. You are only asked to show that there exist constants that make the two equivalent.
 
Gah, I messed up - forgot to put r^2 rather than just r in the formula for a_r.
 
Contadoren11 said:
Gah, I messed up - forgot to put r^2 rather than just r in the formula for a_r.
Yes, I didn't check that since your questions didn't depend on that detail. Are you ok with this now?
 
Hm. So the force exerted on the Earth by the Sun would be considered negative as well, or? (Also, I don't understand what you mean by "so tends to reduce r").

I reckon I get the constants thing.
 
Contadoren11 said:
Hm. So the force exerted on the Earth by the Sun would be considered negative as well, or? (Also, I don't understand what you mean by "so tends to reduce r").
r is the distance from the Sun to the Earth, so is positive. ##\dot r## is the rate of increase of r, so is speed measured away from the Sun. The acceleration is the rate of increase of velocity away from the Sun, but it will be towards the Sun in practice, so its value will be negative. That is, over time, it acts to reduce the velocity (as a signed quantity) and hence to reduce r; in short, gravity attracts.
 
Of course! Thanks a lot for the elaboration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K