What is the wavelength of the radiation emitted at transition 3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of radiation emitted during transition 3 in an atom's energy state diagram. The user initially attempted to find the wavelength by subtracting the wavelengths of transitions 1 and 2, resulting in an incorrect answer. It was clarified that the correct approach involves converting the wavelengths to energy, finding the difference between the energies of the transitions, and then converting back to wavelength. This method led to the correct answer of 162 nm for transition 3. The user expressed gratitude for the guidance and confirmed understanding for future calculations.
mstud
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure (see attachment) shows part of a energy-state-diagram for an atom. Three energy states are included. At energy transition 1 & 2 the atom emit radiation with the wavelengths of 2.56 \cdot 10^{-8} m and 3.04 \cdot 10^{-8} m, respectively.

Find the wavelength for the radiation which is emitted at transition 3.


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to take wavelength 1 minus wavelength 2, but this gave a completely wrong answer.

I got 4.8 nm. But the answer should be 162 nm.

How shall I then solve it? Does it make any difference to calculate the energy of the two transitions and find the difference between them, or will that give me the same weird answer?

ANY ideas?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 3.322.jpg
    3.322.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 384
Physics news on Phys.org
mstud said:

Homework Statement



The figure (see attachment) shows part of a energy-state-diagram for an atom. Three energy states are included. At energy transition 1 & 2 the atom emit radiation with the wavelengths of 2.56 \cdot 10^{-8} m and 3.04 \cdot 10^{-8} m, respectively.

Find the wavelength for the radiation which is emitted at transition 3.


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to take wavelength 1 minus wavelength 2, but this gave a completely wrong answer.

I got 4.8 nm. But the answer should be 162 nm.

How shall I then solve it? Does it make any difference to calculate the energy of the two transitions and find the difference between them, or will that give me the same weird answer?

ANY ideas?

Thanks

You can only subtract energy - the difference between energy levels.

You need to convert the wavelengths to energy, subtract the energies, then convert the answer back to a wavelength
 
Thought of doing so but I didn't know if it was the right way.

Thank you , know I both got the right answer and know how to do it next time ...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top