Radiation perpendicularly incident to a surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Surface
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider radiation perpendicularly incident to a plane whose index of refraction is n. Show that the reflected wave can be eliminated by covering the plane with a second dielectric layer with index of \sqrt{n} and thickness 1/4 wavelength.


Homework Equations


Boundary conditions: E_{1}^{||}=E_{2}^{||}, and B_{1}^{||}=B_{2}^{||}


The Attempt at a Solution



Electric and Magnetic field at z=0 can be given by:

{E_{I}(z,t)=E_{I}exp[i(k_{1}z-\omega t)],E_{R}(z,t)=E_{R}exp[i(-k_{1}z-\omega t)]},{B_{I}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{I}exp[i(k_{1}z-\omega t)],B_{R}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{R}exp[i(-k_{1}z-\omega t)]}

For 0<z<\frac{\lambda}{4}:

{E_{i}(z,t)=E_{i}exp[i(k_{2}z-\omega t)],E_{r}(z,t)=E_{r}exp[i(-k_{2}z-\omega t)]},{B_{i}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{i}exp[i(k_{2}z-\omega t)],B_{r}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{r}exp[i(-k_{2}z-\omega t)]}

For z>\frac{\lambda}{4}:

{E_{T}(z,t)=E_{T}exp[i(k_{3}z-\omega t)]},{B_{T}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{I}exp[i(k_{3}z-\omega t)]}

These boundary conditions allow us to find simultaneous equations for z=0 and z=\frac{\lambda}{4}:

z=0 => {E_{I}+E_{R}=E_{r}+E_{i}, E_{I}-E_{R}=\beta (E_{r}-E_{i})}

z=\frac{\lambda}{4}=> {E_{r}exp[ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]+E_{i}exp[-ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]=E_{T}exp[ik_{3}\frac{\lambda}{4}], E_{r}exp[ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]-E_{i}exp[-ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]=\alpha E_{T}exp[ik_{3}\frac{\lambda}{4}]}

Here, \alpha =\frac{v_{2}}{v_{3}}, \beta =\frac{v_{1}}{v_{2}}

I have done plenty of algebra to find E_{I} in terms of E_{R}, but this seems to require more information than I have. I am just not seeing the end from here, does anyone have a suggestion on where to go from this point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can offer only limited help ! I do not know where √n comes into the full mathematical analysis BUT, at my level, it is easy to show that the film needs to be λ/4 thick.
Here goes: Light from the low n to high n interface undergoes a phase shift of ∏ (λ/2)
Light striking the high n to low n interface does not undergo a phase shift.
In this example BOTH reflections undergo a λ/2 phase shift because both are from low n to high n.
To eliminate the reflected wave needs interference between the 2 reflected waves and the phase shift must be λ/2 (or 3λ/2, 5λ/2 ...etc).
This means that the film must be λ/4 thick ...light travels there and back through the film.
That is the level of my understanding !
Hope it helps
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top