I Radioactive Dating of Asteroid Elements: How Do Scientists Know?

AI Thread Summary
Scientists determine the age of asteroids through radioactive dating by measuring the ratio of decay products to parent isotopes, which allows them to infer the original amounts of radioactive elements. For example, in uranium-lead dating, the presence of lead in zircon indicates it originated from uranium decay, enabling age calculations based on known decay rates. The method relies on understanding the specific chemistry of the elements involved, as each radioactive process has unique characteristics. This detailed analysis is essential for accurately deducing the original quantities of radioactive elements in the rock. Ultimately, the approach varies by isotope but is grounded in the principles of radioactive decay and chemical behavior.
Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
294
Reaction score
37
TL;DR Summary
When scientists radioactively date elements in the asteroids to determine the age of the solar system, how do they know what the original amount of the radioactive element was?
When scientists use radioactive dating of elements in the asteroids to determine the age of the solar system, how do they know what the original amount of the radioactive element that was in the rock was? Do they need to know what the original amount of the radioactive element was in the rock?

Just looking for a general answer here and if you know of a good webpage that talks about this, go ahead and post it here.

My guess is that there is some ratio of decay products to parent nuclei that can be measured, is this correct?

So for example, let's say that If I look in the asteroid rock and see that 25% of the rock sample is potassium–40 and the other 75% is calcium–40 and Argon–40, and I know the half-life of potassium–40 is 1.3 billion years, then the age of this rock must be about 2.6 billion years (that is, two half-lives have passed by the time and measure the age of this asteroid). Is this along the right logic?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Albertgauss said:
When scientists use radioactive dating of elements in the asteroids to determine the age of the solar system, how do they know what the original amount of the radioactive element that was in the rock was? Do they need to know what the original amount of the radioactive element was in the rock?
Take, for example, uranium-lead dating. This is often done on the mineral zircon, because zircon strongly rejects lead but will incorporate uranium into it. So we know that all the lead found in the zircon must have come from the radioactive decay of uranium since it couldn't have been formed with lead inside it. Then it's a matter of determining the ratio of lead to uranium and using the decay rate of uranium (which is known) to find out how much time had to have passed to get that ratio.

Other decay dating methods use similar methods.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and berkeman
Oh, I see. You really have to know some detailed chemistry of the kind in the example you described to deduce what the original amount must have been. What you wrote makes sense to me. Not a one-chemistry-fits-all but finding out some way of what the original amount or ratio must have been will be a unique method to each radioactive process. I think I get it.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top