Radioactivity Question, Is this method correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the amount of a radioactive substance at time t1 + λ will be half of the amount at time t1, given the expression for decay. The key equation used is y = y0 e^(kt), with λ defined as -ln(2)/k, representing the half-life. The initial approach contained a mistake in calculating t1, which was later corrected. The final solution confirms that at t1 + λ, the amount indeed equals y1/2, validating the method. The participants conclude that the correct application of the exponential decay formula leads to the desired result.
Irishdoug
Messages
102
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


Show using your expression for \lambda that if at a time t1 the amount is y1, then at a time t1 + ##\lambda## the amount will be ##\frac{y1}{2}##, no matter what t1 is.

Homework Equations


y = y0 ##e^{kt}##

From previous question: half life ##\lambda =-ln2/k##

The Attempt at a Solution


y1 = y0 ##e^{kt1}## so t1 = ##\frac{lny1}{y0k}##

so:

y (t1+## \lambda ##) = y0 e^(k ##\frac{lny1}{y0k}##+ k## \frac{-ln2}{k}##) = y0 e^{ln##\frac{y1}{y0}## +2}

The k's cancel.
-ln2 = ln 1/2
The e and ln cancels

so;
yo * ##\frac{y1}{y0}## * ##\frac{1}{2}## = ##\frac{y1}{2}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fixed the formatting!
 
Irishdoug said:
y (t1+λλ \lambda ) = y0 e^(k lny1y0klny1y0k\frac{lny1}{y0k}+ k−ln2k−ln2k \frac{-ln2}{k}) = y0 e^{lny1y0y1y0\frac{y1}{y0} +2}

This is not correct.
 
I figured it out! Cheers for the response!
 
Irishdoug said:

Homework Statement


Show using your expression for ## \lambda## that if at a time ## t_1## the amount is ##y_1##, then at a time ##t_1 + \lambda## the amount will be ## \frac{y1}{2}##, no matter what ##t_1## is.

Homework Equations


$$ y_t = y_0 e{(kt)}$$

From previous question: half life ##\lambda =\dfrac{-ln2}{k}##

The Attempt at a Solution


$$y_1 = y_0 e^{(kt_1)} \ \ $$
I think the last statement in the first line of 3 is wrong, ie. not ## t_1 = \dfrac {ln( y_1)}{y_0 k} ##
 
Merlin3189 said:
I think the last statement in the first line of 3 is wrong, ie. not ## t_1 = \dfrac {ln( y_1)}{y_0 k} ##

Hi. What I did instead was:

y0 ##e^{kt1+ \lambda}## --> ##\lambda =-ln2/k##

= y0##e^{kt1}## * ##e^{k \lambda}## =

y1 * ##e^{ln(1/2)}##

= ##\frac{y1}{2}##
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top