Calculating the Radius of Curvature for a Car on a Hill

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of curvature for a car moving over a hill at 85.7 km/h, the speed must be converted to meters per second, resulting in approximately 2.38 m/s. The only force acting on a package in the car is gravity, which allows for the use of the centripetal acceleration formula. By applying F = ma, the equation simplifies to mg = mv^2/r, leading to the cancellation of mass. This results in the formula r = v^2/g, allowing for the calculation of the radius of curvature without needing the mass of the package. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between speed, gravity, and curvature in this context.
waldvocm
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
An automobile moves at a constant speed over the crest of a hill traveling at a speed of 85.7km.h. At the top of the hill a package on a seat in the rear of the car barely remains in contact with the seat. What is the radius of curvature (m) of the hill?

85.7km/h=2.38m.s v=2.38m/s ac=v^2/r r=v^2/a

I know that the only force acting on the package is gravity. Does this mean that the mass of the package is 9.80? mg=m*ac

I am not sure where to go from here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Error in "85.7km/h=2.38m.s"
In 85.7 km/h you must replace the km with 1000 m and the h with 3600 s.

You are so close when you say "only force acting on the package is gravity"!
Put this into F = ma and realize that the acceleration is centripetal so put that formula in for a. Solve for R.
 
So...
F=m*v^2/r

9.80=m*23.8^2/r

How do I solve for r if I don't know the mass of the package?
 
F = ma
mg = m*v^2/r
and the m's cancel.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top