Raising and lowering operators on a simple harmonic oscillator

qualal
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I'm currently studying for a quantum mechanics exam but I am stuck on a line in my notes:

Ha\left|\Psi\right\rangle =\hbar\omega\left(a^{t}a a + \frac{a}{2}\right)\left|\Psi\right\rangleHa\left|\Psi\right\rangle =\hbar\omega\left(\left(a a^{t} - 1\right)a + \frac{a}{2}\right)\left|\Psi\right\rangle
Where H is the harmonic oscillator hamiltonian

H = \frac{P^{2}}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2} x^{2}and a, a^{t} are the lowering and raising operators respectively.

a^{t} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\hbar m \omega}}\left(m \omega x - i p\right)

a= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\hbar m \omega}}\left(m \omega x + i p\right)

The part I don't understand is how they got from a^{t}a a to \left(a a^{t} - 1\right)a

I'm not afraid of doing a bit of calculating but I really need a hint as to what method I should use.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure your first equation is correct?

The Hamiltonian has one of two forms

H=\hbar\omega(aa^t-1/2)

H=\hbar\omega(a^ta+1/2)

Whichever form you use, if you tack on an extra at on the right, you don't end up with what you have. Check your notes farther up.
 
Apologies I mistyped when I wrote

Ha^{t}\left|\Psi\right\rangle

I meant to say Ha\left|\Psi\right\rangle

does this make more sense now?

It now looks just like your second hamiltonian multiplied by "a" to me.
 
Now that you got the first line right, you can get from the first to the second line using the commutator

[a, a^t]=1
 
thanks so much! this has been bothering me all day!

I used \left[ a,a^{t}\right]= a a^{t}-a^{t} a =1

and re-arranged to get

a a^{t}-1=a^{t} a

which I then sub straight into the first line :-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top