Ranking Rotational Inertia Task

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around ranking four structures based on their rotational inertia, with initial attempts leading to confusion. The key insight is that rotational inertia depends not just on mass but significantly on the distance of that mass from the axis of rotation. The parallel axis theorem is highlighted as a useful tool for comparing moments of inertia, indicating that structures with mass closer to the axis will have lower inertia. After reviewing lecture notes, the correct ranking is suggested to be b > a > d > c. Understanding the parallel axis theorem is crucial for accurately determining these rankings.
B3NR4Y
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


I'm given the following four structures with their rotational axes marked, I have to rank them from largest to smallest rotational inertias, I have trouble with that apparently.
QBxEISS.png


Homework Equations


No equations are really necessary, just my book says the more mass there is on one side of the rotation axis, the higher the rotational inertia.

The Attempt at a Solution


I gave the following four answers
a>b>d=c (Before I read the chapter, just using intuition)
a>b>d>c
a>b>c>d (again before I read the chapter, at this point I realized I was completely off)
c=d>b>a (I said c and d are equal because the mass they both separate is about equal, and b is greater than a because it seems it would be "harder" to rotate about that axis then a, a would rotate freely, b would have a bit of trouble, c and d would balance)

Am I thinking about this all wrong (yes)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can compare a with c and b with d easily by using the parallel axis theorem (but it should also be reasonably intuitive). Comparing a with b and c with d is somewhat harder. I don't find it intuitively obvious. One trick you can use is to cancel out equivalent contributors. E.g., the horizontal member of b cancels one vertical member of a.
 
It is not a matter of how much is on each side, it is a matter of how far away from the axis of rotation the mass is. Haruspex' suggestion of cancelling equivalent contributions is a good one (I assume all bars are to be considered as having the same length and mass).
 
Orodruin said:
It is not a matter of how much is on each side, it is a matter of how far away from the axis of rotation the mass is. Haruspex' suggestion of cancelling equivalent contributions is a good one (I assume all bars are to be considered as having the same length and mass).
Yeah I read my professor's lecture notes for today (these exercises are prelecture so he knows where we stand, but they're graded on accuracy so I try to get right) and my task here made more sense. I got b>a>d>c, which I think is right. However I do not know the parallel axis theorem, or I have never given it a name. What is that?
 
B3NR4Y said:
Yeah I read my professor's lecture notes for today (these exercises are prelecture so he knows where we stand, but they're graded on accuracy so I try to get right) and my task here made more sense. I got b>a>d>c, which I think is right. However I do not know the parallel axis theorem, or I have never given it a name. What is that?
Yes, I get that answer too.
For present purposes, the parallel axis theorem tells you that the moment of inertia about an axis through the mass centre (as in c and d) is less than about any other axis parallel to it. This tells you a > c and b > d. It remains to compare a and d. For those, you can cancel the horizontal of d with the two lower halves of the verticals in a, and the horizontal of a with one vertical of d. For what's left, it should be evident that a > d.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top