RC circuit - Capacitor discharge

AI Thread Summary
When a capacitor discharges, the potential difference across its plates equals that across the resistor. The equation governing this process is derived from Kirchhoff's Second Law, which states that the sum of voltages in a closed loop must equal zero. The correct expression for charge over time is q(t) = Q_0 exp(-t/RC), indicating the need for a negative sign in the original equation. The discussion highlights that during discharge, dq/dt is negative, leading to a contradiction if not properly accounted for. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing RC circuits.
jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
When a capacitor discharges, the potential difference between its plates and the resistor's terminals is the same. Hence,

\frac{Q}{C}=R \frac{dq}{dt}
Solving this equation we get

q(t)= Q_{0} exp \frac{t}{RC}

Obviously, this isn't the solution. It is actually q(t)= Q_0 exp \frac{-t}{RC}. So, I'm missing a minus sign on the original equation.

But why should it be there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Kirchoff's Second Law, the sum of the voltages is equal to zero. R(dQ/dt) + (Q/C) = 0, therefore you need -R(dQ/dt) = (Q/C). I apologize for the lack of proper script.
 
Thank you.
Didn't know such laws.
 
If the capacitor discharges, then dq/dt is negative, so according toyour originial equation, Q/C which is positive equals something negative
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top