Reaction involving copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate

  • Thread starter Thread starter kinthos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved dissolving 7.80 g of copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate in water, adding iron filings, and observing a reddish-brown solid after drying. The solid's color suggests it is not iron (II) sulfate, which is typically greenish, leading to speculation that it could be copper or iron (III) sulfate. Theoretical yields were calculated for possible compounds, indicating that if the solid were copper, it would weigh 1.96 g, while iron (III) sulfate would be 8.31 g, and iron (II) sulfate would be 4.74 g. There is uncertainty about whether the solid was hydrated, as the drying process may not have completely removed water. Clarification is sought regarding the interpretation of the drying statement in the context of hydration.
kinthos
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



7.80 g of copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4*5H2O) were dissolved in a beaker of 50 mL of water and heated slowly. 2.00 g of iron filings were added to the solution, and then the mixture was allowed to cool. The supernate was decanted, and the contents of the beaker were dried. The solid at the bottom was reddish-brown, and its mass was 2.36 g.

What was this solid? Was it iron (II) sulfate, iron (III) sulfate, or copper? Was it hydrated?

Homework Equations



Tentative equations:
If iron (II) sulfate formed...CuSO4*5H2O(aq) + Fe(s) = Cu(s) + FeSO4(aq) + 5 H2O(g)
If iron (III) sulfate formed...3 CuSO4*5H2O(aq) + 2 Fe(s)= 3 Cu(s) + Fe2(SO4)3(aq) + 15 H2O(g)

The Attempt at a Solution


The solid was reddish-brown, so it is probably not an iron (II) compound (which are greenish). I don't believe that the solid was hydrated; water vapor rose from the beaker when it was heated (although that may just be due to the aqueous solution).

I attempted to find the theoretical yield by first finding the limiting reactant (CuSO4*5H2O) and then determining the expected mass of compounds. If the solid was copper and was anhydrous, the mass should be 1.96 g; if it was iron (III) sulfate, the mass should be 8.31 g, and if it was iron (II) sulfate it should be 4.74 g.

I'm unsure of the solid's identity. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"... and the contents of the beaker were dried."

Maybe I'm wrong, but that statement doesn't say "heated", so perhaps the water of hydration wasn't driven off.

Can anyone back me up or explain my error here?

Gracias.

Best of luck.

Steve
 
iron (II)

is produced
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top