A Real parameters and imaginary generators

Heisenberg1993
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I was reading some lecture notes on super-symmetry (http://people.sissa.it/~bertmat/lect2.pdf, second page). It is stated that ". In order for all rotation and boost parameters to be real, one must take all the Ji and Ki to be imaginary". I didn't understand the link between the two. What does imaginary generators have to do with getting real parameters? By parameters, do we mean the ones that appear in the group element as exponential of the generator, or the ones used when deriving the fundamental representation of these generators (see: https://www.classe.cornell.edu/~pt267/files/notes/FlipSUSY.pdf, page 3, phrase after (2.16) to understand what I mean)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parameters parametrize the Lie group elements and for a real Lie group must be real numbers. We often for algebraic expediency consider the complexification (extension by allowing the parameters to be complex) especially when we embed the whole system within a representation algebra (typically a matrix algebra over a complex space.) The assertion here is that the exponent must be imaginary presumably in order to assure the Lie group element is within the mentioned SU(2)xSU(2) compact group. That exponent being the product of parameter and generating operator leads to the stated conclusion.
 
Let "T" be the generator. Then the group element is g=eiαT, where α is the parameter. The existence of the "i" already makes the exponential imaginary. If we make the generator pure imaginary, this will in fact require α to be pure imaginary.
 
The exponent in your form is imaginary provided the T generator is real (has all real e-vals). You can absorb the i into the generator but it is kept separate in QM because it also is identified as an observable. So the question about the "imaginarity" of iT passes through to the question of the "reality" of T.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top