Recoil velocity on frictionless surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the recoil velocity of a child standing on frictionless ice after throwing a snowball. Participants explore the application of momentum and kinetic energy equations, noting that momentum conservation is applicable in this scenario while kinetic energy conservation may not be due to external energy input from the child. The importance of correctly applying the equations is emphasized, particularly in recognizing that kinetic energy is conserved in perfectly elastic collisions but not in inelastic ones. Clarification is sought on when to use the kinetic energy formula, with the consensus that it applies when no external forces affect the system. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy transfer in such scenarios.
Valenti
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child stands on frictionless ice and throws a snowball. Estimate the recoil velocity of the child.

Homework Equations


m1v1i + m2v2i =m1v1 +m2v2f
1/2mv21i + 1/2 mv22i = 1/2 mv21f + 1/2mv22f

The Attempt at a Solution


After choosing estimates for weight of snowball, speed of child throwing snowball and weight of child I plugged it into the momentum and kinetic energy laws and solved for the final velocity in both of them, but I am not sure which equation is supposed to be used and in what situations
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your work in detail.
 
gneill said:
Show your work in detail.
Thanks, checked my work again and noticed i forgot to sq root for Vf in the KE formula, since it was negative only the momentum equation works. What type of questions would the KE formula be used though?
 
Kinetic energy is conserved when no external forces act on the system, or when there are no other avenues for energy loss or gain from the system. In perfectly elastic collisions kinetic energy is conserved. In inelastic collisions kinetic energy is not conserved.

A person throwing an object is equivalent to a "reverse" inelastic collision, where two bodies that were once connected are separated by some energy being injected: the person throwing the snowball is providing energy via their muscles, which is not accounted for by the simple conservation of KE formula applied to the individual masses.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top