Recoil when ball is accelerated but not released

  • Thread starter Thread starter katieoneill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
A skateboarder will not experience recoil if he accelerates a ball but does not release it, as the system's center of mass remains unchanged. When the ball is accelerated forward, an equal and opposite force acts on the skateboarder, but since the ball is not released, the skateboarder must apply a backward force to stop the ball, resulting in no net movement. For momentum to create an equal and opposite reaction, the two masses must separate. This principle applies to any system where a part accelerates without being released, such as in a rocket with exhaust gases contained. Therefore, without separation, there is no recoil or continuing motion.
katieoneill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katieoneill said:

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.

When you throw a ball, you apply a forward force to it. Newtons 3rd law say an equal sized force will act back on you - accelerating you.
If you don't release the ball, you must apply a backward force to stop that ball again. That means a forward force on you.

The ball first accelerates forwards, then accelerates backwards - but has a net movement forward.

You will first accelerate backwards, then accelerate Forwards - but have a net movement back.

The centre of mass of you and the ball will remain in the same place throughout.
 
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?
 
katieoneill said:
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?

That is correct, they must separate to get continuing motion.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top