Recoil when ball is accelerated but not released

  • Thread starter Thread starter katieoneill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of recoil in a system involving a skateboarder and a ball that is accelerated but not released. The subject area pertains to momentum and Newton's laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Newton's third law in the context of a skateboarder accelerating a ball. There is confusion regarding the application of momentum vectors and the effects of forces when the ball is not released. Questions arise about whether a system can experience recoil without separation of masses.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the mechanics of the scenario, suggesting that for recoil to occur, the masses involved must separate. The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining different interpretations of the principles involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the conditions under which momentum conservation applies, particularly in closed systems where components do not separate.

katieoneill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katieoneill said:

Homework Statement


Will a skateboarder (initially at rest) experience recoil if he accelerates a ball as if about to throw but does not release the ball?


Homework Equations


pinitial=pfinal when not external forces


The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused with how to apply the momentum vectors for the throwing arm/ball and the body of the skateboarder.

When you throw a ball, you apply a forward force to it. Newtons 3rd law say an equal sized force will act back on you - accelerating you.
If you don't release the ball, you must apply a backward force to stop that ball again. That means a forward force on you.

The ball first accelerates forwards, then accelerates backwards - but has a net movement forward.

You will first accelerate backwards, then accelerate Forwards - but have a net movement back.

The centre of mass of you and the ball will remain in the same place throughout.
 
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?
 
katieoneill said:
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks so much. Just for clarification, I should take this to mean that for any case where a part of a system accelerates but is not released (ie if somehow rocket exhaust gases were released into a compartment of the rocket itself and not into space), there will be no recoil/equal and opposite momentum (ie the rocket will not move)? Basically, for some momentum to cause an equal and opposite reactant momentum, the 2 masses having momentum must separate?

That is correct, they must separate to get continuing motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K