Recommended E&M summer book for a soon to be EE student

AI Thread Summary
Starting university as an electrical engineering student requires a solid understanding of foundational concepts in physics and mathematics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of preparing for courses in Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) and classical physics, as well as the need for a rigorous approach to studying these subjects. Recommended resources include "Engineering Electromagnetics" by William Hayt for its theoretical depth, and free textbooks from Professor Fitzpatrick that cover various levels of physics. For a strong mathematical foundation, studying vector calculus and differential equations is crucial, with suggestions to explore "Div, Grad, Curl and All That" and "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences" by Boas. Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" is highlighted as a challenging yet beneficial text that can enhance understanding of E&M concepts. The discussion notes that while electrical engineering courses may focus more on applications, a deep theoretical understanding will provide a significant advantage.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm about to start university as an electrical engineer student, and I'd like to have a better grasp of the theory behind the stuff we'll see in the program. I've been through Cegep here ( I think it's the equivalent of the last high school year + the first University year in the United-States; it is considered post-secondary education and it is required to attend university).

I have followed Calc I, II, III, physics I, II and III, and linear algebra. The physics courses were lightly calculus based, physics II (E&M) being the one that required the most calculus.

However, if I were to attend university I would still have to take courses such as Electricity and magnetism, classical physics, etc., so these "post secondary" physics courses aren't physics undergrad courses (just making sure the CEGEP part doesn't confuse anyone).

I'm a very motivated student, I don't mind working harder to understand a more rigorous book (I plan to do exercises also) but since I have no idea about what undergrads actually start with, I don't want to "waste" hours in a book to find out it's too easy or too advanced for my level.

If you guys could list a book or 2 that would be good for what I'm looking for, that would be awesome :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
engineering electromagnetics by William Hayt is a pretty good book, And it goes into theory.
 
Some free resources can be found at:

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.html

Here you will find Prof. Fitzpatrick has posted what are essentially free textbooks for introductory (fresh/soph US), intermediate (Jr/Sr in US) and graduate level. These are physics, not EE, but a casual look at some of his books indicates that they are pretty well written. And of course, free.

good luck,

jason
 
You can try Div, Grad Curl and all that which will review vector calculus in the scope of simple Electrostatics.

I am not quite sure the level of depth that an EE major would go into in a junior level Engineering E&M course, but I'm pretty sure it won't go beyond the depth that a junior level physics E&M course would go into (which would be, essentially a theoretical E&M course).

So if you want to prepare for the worst, study up Div, Grad, Curl and All That, grab a good book on DE's that cover topics like separation of variables, Fourier's trick, etc in some depth (maybe Boas' Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences). Then give Griffith's Intro To Electrodynamics a shot.

If you can handle that book, I'm pretty sure you'll be able to handle anything an engineering E&M course is likely to throw at you (mind you, I took the junior level physics E&M course using this book and the course was extremely difficult), and even if you don't completely understand everything (which is totally fine, because most of us had a very tough time with this course and we had a professor and a T/A to help us through it), you will probably have a deeper understanding for the subject than most will in your EE class.

I am not trying to say that EE is easier than Physics, rather Physics majors cover the subject in more depth, theoretically than an EE major would. An EE E&M class would probably be more application based than theory based. In any case, being very sharp with your vector calculus and PDE's will probably be VERY VERY VERY helpful regardless if your class is theory or application based.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top