Recommended software for converting 2D images to 3D CAD model.

AI Thread Summary
Several users are seeking software to convert 2D images into 3D CAD models for aerospace engineering, emphasizing the need for offline solutions rather than cloud-based options. Photo Modeler is mentioned as a potential tool, along with Insight3D, which may assist in this process. However, the discussion highlights the complexity of creating accurate 3D models from 2D drawings, noting that significant additional information is often required for precision. Autodesk's 123D is suggested as a viable option for users looking for effective software. Overall, the conversation underscores the challenges and considerations in achieving high-quality 3D conversions from 2D images.
ENgez
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Does anybody know/had experience with software that can turn 2D images to 3D models in CAD program, preferably in an offline environment (not on cloud)?

The resulting model has to be accurate enough for aerospace engineering purposes.

from looking online, I really didn't find anything except photo modeler.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you looking for a software program that can automatically convert 2D to 3D, or with the aid of an experienced CAD operator?
To extrapolate 3D from 2D for visualization purposes, maybe... To create a 3D file accurate enough to be useful in building parts, there is a lot of information that must be added to a 2D file. As an example, think about the 2D drawings for a turbine rotor or even a piston. There is just no way to extrapolate the shapes of those 2 items from a 2D drawing.
Almost any 3D parametric CAD program will import a 2D drawing to use as a starting point-here is how it goes:
http://www.zwsoft.com/Service_Support/ser_zw3d/Tricks/780.html
 
Autodesk has a tool called 123D that would work great for your purposes I think. Give it a try and see what you think.

http://www.123dapp.com/
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top