Redrawing Circuits for Diode Analysis: Is It Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QueenFisher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Diode
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the validity of redrawing a circuit for diode analysis, specifically regarding the impact of voltmeters and a non-conducting diode. Participants agree that the high resistance of the voltmeters allows for neglecting their current, and the reverse-biased diode's current can also be considered negligible. It is clarified that for an ideal diode, the reverse-biased current is zero, making the approximation valid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the resistance and conductance of circuit components in analysis. Overall, the approach to redrawing the circuit is deemed acceptable under the discussed conditions.
QueenFisher
in the diagram below, the voltmeters are as near to perfect as possible, the cell has negligible internal resistance. the red blob is a conducting diode, and the green blob is non-conducting. the coloured boxes are resistors. in order to work out the current through the red diode, is it ok to redraw the circuit as shown on the left? i figured that as the voltmeters have very high resistance, there'd be virtually no current through them, and none at all through the green diode. is this an ok way of looking at it?

http://home.ripway.com/2005-7/361234/circuit.bmp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Negligible Conductances

I think you are on the right track. The conductance of Voltmeters can be neglected if they are in parallel with a much lower resistance element. Likewise, the current through the "non-conducting" diode can be neglected if it is much less than that through the reddish rectangle. If it is an ideal diode, then the current under reverse bias is zero, and your approximation is exact.
 
yes my teacher told me to take the resistance of the reverse-biased diode as zero, so i hope it will work.

thanks for checking it!
 
I think you are all set, but didn't your teacher mean that the current of the reverse biased ("non-conducting") diode is zero, or the conductance of the reverse biased diode is zero, or the resistance of the reverse biased diode is infinite?

Best Regards,
Walter
 
sorry 'bout that, i typed it wrong. :blushing: thanks for noticing.
 
Don't mention it -- I thought it was a typo, but wanted to make sure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top