Reducing fringe effect, measuring values

  • Thread starter Thread starter edmondng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fringe Measuring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring low capacitance values using a parallel plate setup, specifically focusing on the challenges posed by fringe effects and the choice of dielectric materials. Participants explore methods to enhance measurement stability and signal amplification, while also considering the impact of environmental factors on the readings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes measuring low capacitance (around 20pF) and notes significant voltage swings due to nearby interference, suggesting that the fringe effect is impacting measurements.
  • Another participant proposes using grounded metal shielding to mitigate interference and recommends maintaining a distance between the shielding and the capacitor plates.
  • A suggestion is made to try different dielectric materials, such as oil, to potentially increase the voltage change observed during measurements.
  • One participant shares their experience plotting voltage against capacitance and notes a saturation effect, indicating potential measurement setup issues and the possibility of losing the electric field elsewhere.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of water as a dielectric, with a recommendation to avoid conductive materials to maintain measurement integrity.
  • There is a discussion about whether adding salt to water would enhance conductivity, with a warning against this approach as it may not be beneficial for the intended measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of water as a dielectric and the effects of conductivity on capacitance measurements. There is no consensus on the best dielectric material or the optimal setup for achieving stable measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in their setups, including the need for proper shielding and the choice of dielectric materials, which may influence the accuracy and stability of their measurements.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in experimental physics, electrical engineering, or anyone working with capacitance measurements and seeking to understand the effects of environmental factors on their setups.

edmondng
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to measure some low capacitance using parallel plates i built. We're probably looking into the pF, say maybe 20pF (with the pcb board etc). The change in capacitance that i am really interested is very small. For the moment, i have use water as my dielectric. The capacitance that i am measuring is measured in terms of voltage by using a control capacitor, then goes through my 16bit A/D. The differential voltage from 0ml to 250ml is approx 20mV. This is a really small value.

One thing i did notice is that there seems to be some sort of fringing effect field surrounding the plates. Put you hand within 1 feet of the plates and the voltage swings away. Stay 3 feet away and its more stable. The stability increases with distance, so the nearer you are the more the voltage swing. I take it because the capacitance and e-field is being disturbed, small capacitance change in the pF results in my voltage change.

I was thinking of using some kind of guard material to isolate my test area. What sort of material should i use? Plastic doesn't seem to have any effect. Also since i am looking at small values, is it possible to see a bigger change or amplify my signal? Its 16bit A/D, amplifying the voltage would not help. What i need is a bigger change like from 0ml to 250ml with maybe 1V change rather than 20mV. Any help, suggestion, books to look at would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the value changes when your hand is 1' away, that sounds more like AC mains interference into your test setup. And yes, grounded metal shielding would be good to have around your setup where you are measuring small values. Make a metal cylinder around the whole setup and ground it, keeping it spaced away from your capacitor by several multiples of the maximum plate spacing. The fringe field will not extend out more than a couple times the plate spacing, I wouldn't think.
 
"The differential voltage from 0ml to 250ml is approx 20mV."
"What i need is a bigger change like from 0ml to 250ml with maybe 1V change rather than 20mV."

Try a different dielectric material. Maybe some sort of oil. You could check different things?
 
i tried with factory capacitors and based on the values i use, i plotted a graph of voltage vs capacitance. seems that at a certain region the rate of voltage change is more and then it saturates. Since my plate resulted in only 20mV change the most and the voltage fell somewhere between the region where i could get a high rate of change (using factory caps), i think it has something to do with my whole setup measurement. I must be losing my field elsewhere. Not to mention calculated values were nowhere close.

I'm going to redo my whole setup, enclose everything, put a guard material to gnd around it as well. Any other things i should look at?

Thanks
 
Make sure your dielectric is non-conductive. What kind of "water" did you use?
 
i tried deionized and just regular tap water. would adding salt make it more conductive be better? i thought adding conductive would increase the capacitance so if i don't see a lot of 'action' could try it
 
No, do not make it more conductive. I'm also not real comfortable with water as a dielectric anyway. Can you research oil-filled capacitors, and try it with an appropriate oil? At least I've heard of oil-filled caps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K