A Reference frame conversion for a moving sphere

AI Thread Summary
Estimating the total kinetic energy of a spherical particle using a MEMS sensor involves calculating both translational and rotational components. The sensor provides angular velocity data but lacks linear velocity, necessitating an integral of acceleration, which is complicated by noise and drift issues. The challenge arises from the sensor's body frame reference, while linear velocity requires an Eulerian frame. Various methods exist for converting reference frames, and filtering techniques may be necessary to address drift. Input on specific approaches or solutions for this common problem is sought.
hfarhadi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi

here is the situation; There's a spherical particle contained with a MEMS sensor (3D accelerometer and gyroscope) moving down a bed. What we want is to estimate the total kinetic energy of the particle. The total kinetic energy has two parts, translational part and rotational part. for the translational part we need the norm of the linear velocity and for the rotational part the norm of the angular velocity is needed. the sensor output delivers the angular velocity values (3D) but no linear velocity. It seems we need to conduct an acceleration integral to estimate linear velocity but the noise and drift issue is there. Also the sensor is body framed reference not inertial. For linear velocity we need to have an Eulerian frame but the sensor output is in Lagrangian frame.

Does anyone has an idea on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hfarhadi said:
Does anyone has an idea on this?
It's a standard problem. Have you done any search on the web?
 
A.T. said:
It's a standard problem. Have you done any search on the web?
Yes. there are some methods to convert frame references but I need to know how it really needs to be done and if there's any need for any filters how to solve the drift issue etc.
 
hfarhadi said:
Yes. there are some methods to convert frame references.
I meant that specifically tracking motion from inertial sensors is a common problem, with tons of literature on it.
 
A.T. said:
I meant that specifically tracking motion from inertial sensors is a common problem, with tons of literature on it.
Yeah, sure it is. but any idea/suggest/feedback on the case is welcome.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top